Ayodhya verdict in Supreme Court LIVE Updates: A bench-headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra had reserved the verdict on July Ayodhya verdict updates: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in a majority judgement that the mosque-namaz case need not be referred to. Ayodhya Case: The Supreme Court verdict ended with majority, Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the.
|Country:||Antigua & Barbuda|
|Published (Last):||19 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||16.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ayodhya case: Know in four points what today’s ruling means
The two-judge bench of Supreme Court remarked that the High Court ruling was surprising as no party wanted a split of the site. In the RamayanaAyodhya is the birthplace of the god-king Ramathe son of Dasharathathe ruler of Ayodhya, and verdct queen Kausalya. The Jesuit priest Joseph Tieffenthalerwho visited Awadh inwrote, “Emperor Aurangzebe got the fortress called Ramcot demolished and got a Muslim temple, with triple domes, constructed at the judge,ent place.
Many Muslim organisations have continued to express outrage at the destruction of the disputed structure. Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing Muslim appellants, had argued that the observation in the Ismail Farooqui judgment has affected the status of mosques in Islam.
Ayodhya dispute – Wikipedia
The way is now clear for the hearing of Ram janmabhoomi appeals: The bench said, ‘First, we should put this controversy on verdict to rest. Objection to the ruling The issue of ruling came up when a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was hearing the appeals against the Allahabad High Court’s verdict.
On September 30,the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High court had said that Hindus and Muslims were joint title-holders of the disputed land. Will be displayed Will not be displayed Will be displayed.
The Supreme Court observed that a mosque was not an essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam and namaz could be offered anywhere, even in ayohdya open. Babari Masjid of Ayodhya.
Patronage and Popularisation, Pilgrimage and Procession. The verdict on the case is expected around 2 pm.
Three months after being constituted, the Liberhan Commission began investigations into who and what led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque. He also found a letter from a judegment Trilokchand, datedstating that, while under the Muslim administration people had been prevented from taking a ritual bath in the Saryu river, the establishment of the Jaisinghpura has removed all impediments.
The title suit case would only arise judegment this challenge is cleared by the seven judge bench. Engineer, Asghar Ali, ed.
The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Majority judgement will please majority, minority judgement will please minority. The state government had said the law decided by the top court in the Ismail Farooqi case was “the correct law which does not deserve to be disturbed either by referring it as belatedly prayed for or otherwise”.
After the Vishva Hindu Parishad was formed in and started agitating for the Babri Masjid site, the two strands of ‘saffron politics’ came together. The Allahabad high court bench began hearing the case inwhich was completed in It was revived by the Gahadavalascoming to power in the 11th century A.
Questionable observation of verdict has permeated into Allahabad High Court’s decision in land dispute case. A special bench of the top court headed by CJI Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra is examining a total of 14 appeals that have challenged the Allahabad High court’s judgment delivered in four civil suits. Supreme Court of India rules against immediate constitution of a larger bench to hear the case .
This will alert our moderators to take action Name Reason for reporting: The Case Against the Temple.
Ayodhya Ram Mandir- Babri Masjid Verdict: Know in four points what today’s ruling means
In ayohdya times, a mosque was located at the supposed birth spot of Rama, which sat on a large mound in the centre of Ayodhya, called the Ramadurg or Ramkot the fort of Rama. Case filed in Indian courts against forceful occupation of the Babri Mosque and placing of idols within it.
Central Government was considering the deployment of central police forces in the area and dissolution of state government but in the end decided against it.
Also, I have an apprehension that the enemies of secularism in this country will ayochya this judgment to realize their ideological objectives: Senior Supreme Court lawyer Indira Jaising has raised a few questions. The Ayodhya case will be heard from October 29, the Supreme Court said. Earlier, ina three-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, ayoxhya a 2: This cleared the way for the government taking over the land where the 16th century Babri mosque was razed in December by Hindu hardliners who believed it was built on Lord Ram’s birthplace.
Supreme Court Judgement and Commentaries. Sep 27, 4: Here he met the Sufi saints Shah Jalal and Sayyid Musa Ashiqan and took a pledge in return for their blessings for conquering Hindustan.