Learn about Stephen Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis as well as the major criticism of the hypothesis. The input hypothesis, also known as the monitor model, is a group of five hypotheses of second-language acquisition developed by the linguist Stephen Krashen in the s and s. Krashen originally formulated the input hypothesis as just one of the five At such times the affective filter is said to be ” up”. If i represents. The Affective Filter hypothesis. B. The Causative Variable in Second Language Acquisition. 1. The causative variables. 2. Language teaching: does it.

Author: Nenris Faeshakar
Country: Australia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 24 March 2012
Pages: 460
PDF File Size: 12.24 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.47 Mb
ISBN: 797-1-76967-400-9
Downloads: 6694
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akikree

By providing as much comprehensible input as possible, especially in situations when learners are not exposed to the TL outside of the classroom, the teacher is able to krasuen a more effective opportunity for language acquisition. This is done in several ways. I have been homeschooling my daughter for four years now.

Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning. Retrieved May 1, The most popular competitors are the skill-building hypothesis and the comprehensible output hypothesis.

On the other hand, positive affect is necessary, but not sufficient on its own, for acquisition to take place. The Natural Order hypothesis According to Krashen, learners acquire parts of language in a predictable order. Krasheh hypotheses put primary importance on the comprehensible input CI that language learners are exposed to.

According to Krashen ‘learning’ is less important than ‘acquisition’. In addition, many learners tend to monitor their use of the language too much, focusing more on accuracy than fluency which in turn prevents them from using the language in a communicative manner.

Or is Christmas time here? A Short History of Thanksgiving: In this section, we will look at the work of Stephen Krashen, specifically his 6 hypotheses on language acquisition, in order to better understand the challenges that might arise during the language learning process.

Filger often prevents them from speaking or taking in affecitve language at all. However, in spite of the popularity and influence of the Monitor Model, the five hypotheses are not without criticism. Krashen sobre comprehensible input.

The ‘monitor’ acts in a planning, editing and correcting function when three specific conditions are met: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. In other words, when the filter is ‘up’ it impedes language acquisition. An introductory course3rd edn. The ‘acquired system’ or ‘ acquisition ‘ is the product of a subconscious process very similar to the process children undergo when they acquire their first language. Acquisition involves the subconscious acceptance of knowledge where information is stored in the brain through the use of communication; this is the process used for developing native languages.


It is important to involve reading in the language classroom to increase knowledge of the language and the way it is used in real-life contexts. Much of his recent research has involved the study of non-English and bilingual language acquisition.

Very often, when this occurs, both teachers and students are convinced that the study of formal grammar is essential for second language acquisition, and the teacher is skillful enough to present explanations in the target language so that the students understand. Acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language, during which the acquirer is focused on meaning rather than form. What are Krashen’s Hypotheses? She states that they are anxious about using the TL.

The Reading Hypothesis This hypothesis basically states that the more we read in a SL the greater our vocabulary will be. This page was last edited on 24 Septemberat Language-learning aptitude Critical period hypothesis Motivation Willingness to communicate Foreign language anxiety Metalinguistic awareness.

Krashen claims that learners with high motivation, self-confidence, a good self-image, and a low level of anxiety are better equipped for success in second language acquisition. Language acquisition does not require extensive use of conscious grammatical rules, and does not require tedious drill.

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire a language in roughly the same order. Veja aqui mais sobre os conceitos de acquisition e learning. Caldwellcomprehensible input, defined by Krashen as understanding messages, is indeed the necessary condition for acquisition, but it is not sufficient.

Your browser does not support the video tag.

The Affective Filter Hypothesis: Definition and Criticism

In other words, while only the acquired system is able to produce spontaneous speech, the learned system is used to check what is being spoken. This is the principle of dual comprehension. Linguist and educator Stephen Krashen proposed the Monitor Model, his theory of second language acquisition, in Principles and practice in second language acquisition as published in The Monitor hypothesis explains the relationship between acquisition and learning and defines the influence of the latter on the former.


They believe that it is the subject matter itself, the study of grammar, that is responsible for the students” progress, but in reality their progress is coming from the medium and not the message.

The first is not allowing for a silent period expecting the student to speak before they have received an adequate amount of comprehensible input according to their individual needs. This balance will depend on numerous variables including the language level of the students, the context of language use and the personal goals of each student.

Acquisition-learning hypothesis Natural order hypothesis Monitor hypothesis Input hypothesis Affective filter hypothesis However, in spite of the popularity and influence of the Monitor Model, the five hypotheses are not without criticism.

Krashen’s Hypotheses

The following sections offer a description of the fifth and final hypothesis of the theory, the affective filter hypothesis, as well as the major criticism by other linguistics and educators surrounding the hypothesis.

How languages are learnedkrahsen edn. For example, if we acquire the rules of language in a linear order 1, 2, In other words, the teacher talk meets the requirements for comprehensible input and perhaps with the students” participation the classroom becomes an fillter suitable for acquisition.

Retrieved 14 September The ‘learned system’ or ‘ learning ‘ is the product of formal instruction and it comprises a conscious process which results in conscious knowledge ‘about’ the language, for example knowledge of grammar rules. See here an enlightening video by Krashen about comprehensible input. This hypothesis suggests that this natural order of acquisition occurs independently of deliberate teaching and therefore teachers cannot change the order of a grammatical teaching sequence.

The goal of any language program is for learners to be able to communicate effectively. The theory underlies Krashen and Terrell ‘s comprehension-based language learning methodology known as the natural approach Any subject matter that held their interest would do just as well.